Bollywood, a majestic film industry that celebrates, lionizes the films of the So-called super starts ‘khans’ vehemently, is currently experiencing inexplicable insecurities and uneasiness even since dhurandhar2 directed by a nationalist filmmaker Aditya Dhār powerfully hit the theaters, and has been thumping its cinematic grandeur. This film is clearly a bold portrayal of Islamic terrorism that has impacted India, obliterating national security, and peace of this country, emanating from Pakistan through the corrupt, anti India termites.
‘Dhurandhar2: the Revenge’ is being called “propaganda” by Islamists dressed as journalists, pro-Pakistan lawmakers, and an incurably delusional Indian German YouTuber who thinks his videos can ruin a movie like Dhurandhar2, which has broken all previous Hindi film records and earned over 1000 crore. Ranveer Singh starrer film Dhurandhar2 directed by a Kashmiri Hindu Aditya Dhar boldly portrays radical Islamic terrorism, which Pakistan maliciously produced as a result of its unchecked hatred of Hindus in India. It also clarified the covert connections between ISI agents and Indian politicians..
Bollywood and underworld Don Dawood Ibrahim, who used to influence Indian elections through anti-Indian films, counterfeit money, and terrorism, have a melodic relationship that this movie has orchestrated. Therefore, this movie is being called an Islamophobic propaganda by those who were ready to accuse Hindus of being responsible for the 26/11 Mumbai attack. Bollywood filmmakers and congress leaders even had books ready to disparage Hindus for the attacks, but a courageous police officer dashed their hopes of introducing the world to the term “Hindu terror.” Furthermore, consider how weak the previous robotic government was. Instead of taking action against terrorism from Pakistan, they chose to show their timidity by dining with Kashmiri separatist sentenced for murdering Indian army soldiers, and interacting with Pakistan in a more cordial manner, Consequently, this film is enough to cause discomfort and uneasiness to those who flaunted their timidity despite having a strong defense forces.
Terrorism has had a significant impact on India not only through attacks but also through the propagation of pro-Islamic sentiments in movies and the tendency to denigrate other religions, particularly Hinduism, through artistic freedom. Dawood and its illegitimate lovers have negatively Islamized Bollywood. Bollywood has proudly demonstrated how a Hindu can be superstitious and reject all Hindu rituals in the name of education. However, the same Bollywood has absurdly orchestrated malarkey by demonstrating how an atheist Hindu hero can defend himself from bullets by donning a green shrine shawl. Dhurandhar2 is still propaganda. Irony keeps dying. Bollywood that promoted debauchery by creating songs like ‘kachchi kali Hoon’, Naya naya saal hai, naya naya maal hai’ on the pretext of cinematic liberty, is expressing discomfort as they believe dhurandhar2 is promoting enmity and sense of pride in explicit violence and islamophobia, however It is quite understandable because Bollywood is supposed to feel uncomfortable by dhurandhar2, as it has produced films with ridiculous scenes like an Indian hero dancing on beach with a Pakistani agent in bikini and creating a beautiful rapport with terrorists, so their understanding of covert operations, political involvement, nationalism in secret agents, the sense of pride of sacrifice, the aggression against terrorists, and most importantly current political leadership, is less than a kid in a crib.
They have an insane addiction to romantic relationships with Pakistanis, which leads them to encourage love for terrorists. They also accuse the Indian government and army of being hostile to Pakistan. It is clear why dhurandhar2 is a propaganda film for them because it depicts Islamic terrorists in Pakistan and India in a factual manner and is openly labeled as Islamophobic without showing any hateful scenes against Islam. On the other hand, films like PK, which openly insulted Hinduism, its culture, and its rituals, were regarded as a true presentation of freedom of speech and cinematic liberty; additionally, liberals, journalists, and even the courts have advised Hindu protestors not to watch it if it offends them. Why not apply same rule Now, “ don’t watch it if you don’t like”.
Bollywood has been secretly funded for decades to produce anti-nationalist films because filmmakers are only at ease with dancing agents, prostitutes fighting to survive in their opulent palaces, and romantic tales. They were reminded by Raw Violence in Dhurandhar2 that men have high testosterone levels, which are detrimental to the film industry. Moreover, an old filmmaker showed his lustful desire to marry his daughter by kissing her in a magazine photo. Debauchery is therefore acceptable in the industry, but actual fight scenes involving bloodshed, violence, and terrorism in a blockbuster film that no Bollywood producer has ever made, is ironically, referred to as propaganda laden with hyper nationalism, copious amounts of testosterone, and admiration for the current government in power.
The fact that Aditya Dhar undoubtedly hit Dawood Ibrahim’s well-established image by depicting him bedridden has undoubtedly infuriated Bollywood’s Islamists. Don, who had his kind in Indian state politics and funded terrorism in India. Bollywood actors met and enjoyed parties and cricket matches with Dawood, who was revered with pride. Bollywood’s affection for Dawood has been hurt by this ferocious portrayal of an adversary. In addition, the success of Dhurandhar2 at the box office has destroyed the reputation of the so-called Bollywood kings. Bollywood has received a direct message from the audience: they don’t want corny stories about 60-year-old heroes being sexually touched and rubbed by new actresses in bikinis on the beach. The audience has had enough of absurd romantic nonsense.
Whether a filmmaker who humanizes terrorists and expresses disgust over testosterone likes it or not. The audience does not care if a failed actress claims that Dhurandhar2 is a propaganda film, and it is fashionable to celebrate and enjoy jingoism. Fancy words in unwanted opinions due to incurable constipation of insecurity and jealousy will not entice audiences to watch their films with ridiculous stories. The audience demands a new cinematic experience that reveals the truth that Bollywood has hidden for decades. As a result of all negative statements, videos, and a venomous PR campaign, Dhurandhar2 soared to become the highest-grossing film, breaking all records set by Jawan and Bahubali. While southern actors expressed their love and support for the film, actors, and director, but Bollywood is still hidden in a den of denial, frustration, and timidity.
Dhurandhar2 is a perfect example of how a film can portray the truth, exposing the trend of romanticizing terrorists, rapists, Islamists, and failed political parties in India. The leaders and their Bollywood counterparts were completely enamored with Pakistanis. This film demonstrated that truth disturbs liars and comforts seekers. It also discovered that the Indian audience prefers an engaging story, excellent direction, flawless acting, a well-researched team, perfect casting, and an exciting cinematic experience. Hollywood served this, and now an Indian film has done the same with more captivating condiments such as Indian politics, Bollywood, nationalism, and hidden games. Whether YouTube and other propagandists find it full of jingoism, testosterone, violence, and Islamophobia, the audience loves it endlessly. ignoring the negativity around this movie made by an outsider.