The Valley was completely dark during the January 19, 1990, frozen blackout, with the exception of the mosque’s loudspeakers. In Srinagar, Anantnag, and Baramulla, the amplifiers crackled to life and minarets lit up as power was cut to Kashmiri Pandit neighborhoods. The voice that echoed through the towns was an ultimatum etched into the night rather than a call to prayer: “Raliv, Tsaliv, ya Galiv”—Convert, depart, or perish. Hindus had no other choice under the slogan. Terrified Pandit families bolted doors and blew out lamps amidst shouts. This mentality is still deeply embedded in Kashmiri Islamists against Hindus.
Women pulled children under beds while men listened for footsteps. Shopkeepers, teachers, doctors, and government employees who had lived there for generations were suddenly reduced to kafirs with three options, none of which represented life as they knew it. They were identified by the loudspeakers, along with the “crime” of being Hindu in Muslim dominated Kashmir. By dawn, the message had done its job: half a million Hindus had become refugees in their own country, homes had been hastily locked, keys were still in doors, chapels had been desecrated, and only the echo of that night remained, along the memories of horrifying ordeals.
The Kashmiri bigotry is that no secular Kashmiri stood up for the Kashmiri Pandits; instead, they celebrate this as a victory, dismissing the genocidal exodus of Pandits and mocking their agony as propaganda against the Muslim community. The same Kashmiri Islamists who are now maniacally wailing for Khamenei in Srinagar’s streets, were jeering when Hindu tourists were gunned down by terrorists last year after checking their uncircumcised genitalia. They laughed in their Telegram groups, forwarded the videos with a smirk, and labeled it “resistance.” Days later, those same faces appeared in front of the cameras with candles, heads bowed in rehearsed grief, feigning sympathy for the Hindus they had mocked as “kafirs.” The slogans changed—from _”Raliv, Tsaliv, ya Galiv”_ in 1990 to the hollow “We stand with victims” today—but the contempt remained.
It was an impeccable performance. The real mourning was reserved for Tehran. When Khamenei’s name was chanted, the tears were genuine, the chest-beating spontaneous, and the allegiance revealed. They strategically organized a candle march for the Hindu victims of a terrorist attack, whereas they offered to serve as pallbearers for Iran’s theocrat.
While some Burqa-clad women in Lucknow were seen sobbing over Khamenei’s passing and referring to him as “Lion,” President Trump claimed that he died “like a rat.” These radical Islamists who live in complete freedom in India while hiding behind a burqa and hijab are unaware of the misogynistic brutality of Iranian despot Khamenei. Three days after being detained by morality police for wearing an “improper” hijab, 22-year-old Mahsa Amini passed away on September 16, 2022. Iran claimed she had a cardiac condition, but a 2024 UN investigation revealed she had died from abuse while in detention. Nationwide “Woman, Life, Freedom” demonstrations were sparked by her passing. No woman came out wearing a burqa expressed sympathy for the victim. Rights groups claim that security forces killed between 200 and 500 protestors, while Khamenei supported the crackdown and referred to the unrest as “riots” orchestrated by foreigners. Iran then enacted a stricter hijab law that shamelessly included the death penalty, risible AI surveillance, and 10-year prison sentences.
This so-called Lion like leader has legalized child marriage and imprisoned the rights of women and girls wearing the burqa and hijab. In his speech, ironically he expressed his admiration for women and referred to them as flowers rather than housemaids. He also discussed how well he was able to control their lives under Islamic law by forcing them to wear the burqa and hijab, which he claimed were progressive for society. He discussed the rights of women who are imprisoned in tightly wrapped hijabs because, according to a UN report, women arrested for wearing a loose hijab are sexually assaulted inside the jail and get their genitalia electrocuted. These Islamists will not discuss Ayatollah Khamenei’s gender apartheid because his Shia identity is sufficient to cover up his savagery.
You must be wondering why this community is outraged over Khamanei’s death and cursing Israel and America because, because he was a Shia, they don’t care what he did wrong. They keep their grief for the Qaum. There is never-ending grief for Khamenei and Gaza, but no tears for Kashmiri Pandits. These Kashmiri Islamists expressed their grief and sympathy for Iran by contributing the looted wealth of Kashmiri Pandits to Iran’s war against Israel and the US. However, these same Islamists were so offended by the national symbol engraved on the mosque’s board that they violently destroyed it with rocks. Disregard for national symbols while feeling privileged to receive large sums of money from the government.
Kashmir is treated as their fiefdom. This bigotry runs deep among Kashmiris. Even during Corona, these Islamists did not come forward to donate money, gold, or utensils to the army or schools; however, they are deeply concerned about Islamic theocracy in Iran because they believe in what Khamenei refers to as the “war of Islam.”. Furthermore, they are poor, misguided, and underprivileged in terms of government policies, yet wealthy enough to fund Iran’s Islamic regime.
This explains how many Islamic states exist within the Indian Muslim community and how many Indian Islamists desire an Islamic theocracy in India. However, a few secular, sane Muslims have spoken out to explain why mourning over Khamenei is pointless because Indian Muslims should not show loyalty to Iran but rather support India. However, Islamists did not allow their message to reach the masses with their unabated buffoonery of wailing for Khamenei. This glimpse of loyalty to other Islamic nations highlights the disloyalty that Indian islamists harbor in their hearts.
In viral videos, overwhelmed burqa-clad women brazenly stated that they cared about Iran, not India, and that they were simply living in India and did not care about the Indian army or government. I hope these traitors leave for Iran and enjoy Khamanei’s cuisine of women’s rights, only to realize In Iran, they are not legally permitted to come out without their husband’s permission, let alone shout on camera while wearing loose hijabs and face-revealing burqas, as they did in India, without fear of public execution following sexual assault and physical torture. I believe these clowns undoubtedly deserve to savor all of the delicacies of the Iranian regime they yearn to fund, which murdered Iranian women for refusing to comply with morality laws.