Why Do Leaders Fail to Live Up to Expectations?

illustration of man carrying carton box with loss inscription
Photo by Monstera on Pexels.com

One reason that leaders fail to live up to expectations is that they don’t know how to lead. We’ve all seen the example of the former Coca Cola CEO, Douglas Ivester, who failed a basic test of leadership. His strategy didn’t work and he wasn’t confident enough to try another strategy. As a result, he continued with the same system for the next year, and the board of directors fired him.


Many times, leaders fail because they don’t put the team’s needs first. They become power hungry and seek control instead of mentoring others. They also stop navigating their team. To avoid this, it is important to set clear visions and goals and hold yourself accountable for those goals.

An increasing number of empirical studies indicate that leaders abuse their authority, resulting in a substantial decline in employee trust. These findings highlight the need for leadership research to address the issues of building trust and avoiding “asshole” behavior. In this article, we’ll explore some of the reasons why leaders fail to live up to expectations, and how to address them.

A leader’s vision is one of the most important tools for effective leadership. It serves as the leader’s compass to move the organization forward, and without it, the organization is at risk of stagnation and retrogression. The board of directors ultimately fired him for failing to lead the company.

The darker and lighter sides of leadership are informed by TCE’s concept of authority. In this context, leaders must be willing to engage employees in the decision-making process and implement their input. This is important for procedural justice. It also highlights the importance of transparency in leadership.

Often, high expectations are an important part of a company’s culture. If you want your team to succeed, you must communicate clearly what is expected of them. In other words, leadership must communicate its expectations with words and actions. It’s crucial to have a culture of learning from mistakes and turning them into opportunities.

Normative expectations reduce discretion. By limiting the leader’s discretion, normative expectations reduce corrupting influences of authority. A leader’s role is to empower their team. People will trust a leader if they feel empowered. The best leaders have an understanding of these norms.

The role of authority in leadership is under question. Too much power in an organization can lead to an inability to live up to expectations.

Moral legitimacy

The moral legitimacy of a leader’s failure to live up to expectations can be examined using different measures. For example, one can ask employees how they would judge a leader’s ability to live up to expectations. This measure can be a proxy for employee wellbeing. However, this measure has limitations.

Moral legitimacy is often linked to the authority of the leader. Normative expectations are created when a leader has moral legitimacy. It is this normative expectation that opens up a leader to the needs of his or her employees. If the leader does not live up to this expectation, the employees will view it as an affront to their authority and moral character.

Moral legitimacy is important in many settings, including the workplace. It helps limit the discretionary decisions a leader makes. In turn, it can help to reduce corrupting influences of authority. In the workplace, this can reduce the incidence of shirking and opportunism.

In addition, procedural legitimacy develops trust in a leader’s authority. Employees who feel that a leader is fair to them are more likely to support their leader’s authority. It also fosters normative expectations of the leader’s conduct and accountability.

In addition to moral legitimacy, social legitimacy is crucial in many cases. It refers to the degree to which a leader is able to influence others through social norms. The lack of legitimacy can result in a lack of respect or obedience. So, it is imperative to understand the role of moral legitimacy in public policy.

In addition to the social legitimacy of leaders, procedural justice develops a normative expectation of fairness. Leaders must provide transparent evaluations and provide fair due process to their employees. This obligation is consistent with the notion of procedural justice outlined by Rawl (1971).

In addition, moral legitimacy can also be undermined by leaders’ attempts to manipulate employees. For example, some leaders may use false promises or deceive employees to increase their popularity. But these attempts may lead to moral opportunism. In some cases, leaders may also seek to confuse employees into thinking they have genuine intentions and are not abusing their power.

Commitment to empowering employees

Commitment to empowering employees means giving your team the authority to make decisions and take action. Empowering employees ensures that their actions are in line with the organization’s vision. But not all people feel empowered. The most effective leaders have the ability to inspire their teams and make them more productive and engaged.

An empowered team does not wait for permission from the manager before making decisions. It organizes around the leader and uses its seniority and experience to make the right decisions. This means it is usually cross-functional. It also follows the principle of “disagree and commit.”

Empowering employees may not increase their productivity, but it can increase their level of autonomy and citizenship. Empowered employees are more likely to be creative and have innovative ideas. They are more likely to take on extra assignments and show initiative. They are more likely to be trusted by their subordinates.

An empowered workforce is more loyal to an organization. Its employees want to feel like their work is contributing to something bigger than their paycheck. Similarly, consumers want to work with companies that have a greater cause than themselves. They will buy from a company more than once if they trust its mission. Employees’ loyalty is also affected by the way a company conducts itself.

Motivation to make a good impression

There are a variety of ways to motivate employees. Some methods include providing incentives, salary bonuses, and awards. Other methods involve setting performance goals for employees. Setting performance goals inspires employees to work harder, and they can encourage positive competition among their coworkers. No matter which method you use, make sure to do it on a consistent basis.

The goal of meeting or exceeding high expectations can drive an individual to improve performance. However, high expectations can also reduce motivation and lead to failure. In other words, while high expectations can help motivate, they can also depress performance. It’s important to realize that external performance expectations can be a liability if they are too high.

In order to be effective, leaders must motivate their teams. They need to inspire hope and help employees cross the finish line. Today’s workplace is competitive and intense, and employees appreciate working with leaders who help them bring out the best in each person. However, in order to be successful, leaders must also be genuine and inspiring.

To encourage employees, executives must provide meaningful jobs that make them feel important. This will help them align their personal objectives with the organization’s goals. Employees who feel important in their work will want to do it well. In order to be effective leaders, executives must be self-motivated and able to achieve their own goals while simultaneously achieving the company’s goals.

Was it worth reading? Let us know.