Is Racial Equality the New Buzzword?

architects looking at plans in office
Photo by RODNAE Productions on

Is racial equality the new “buzzword”? Here are some definitions and a discussion of racial equality. First, inclusion: diversity is an essential part of the concept of equality. Inclusion implies true belonging and empowerment. Equity: equal opportunity. Equality emphasizes the fact that everyone gets the same chances. But it often ignores historical exclusion and power differentials among whites.

Creating a common language for racial equality

A common language on race is essential to effective communication on issues of racial equity. Various stakeholders need to have a common understanding of the terms, which may cause discussions to derail. It is crucial to develop a common understanding of the concepts of race, equity, oppression, and power, in order to coordinate work on the issue. By defining these terms, we can create a common narrative of what racial equality and justice mean and how to promote equity.

The use of a common vocabulary can make it easier to communicate our vision of racial equity to those who hold different views. For example, we can use terms such as “BIPoC,” which stands for black, Indigenous, and people of color. We can also use terms such as “cisgender,” which aligns with the sex assigned at birth. By using such language and vocabulary, we can better understand how we can promote race equity and create an inclusive culture.

There are various forms of racism that prevent people from accessing resources that would help them. Many POC people don’t have access to mental health resources, a practice known as tokenism. Tokenism is when an individual is forced to represent everyone who looks like them, and tokenism can be detrimental. Tone policing is another problem, which focuses on the emotional content of a message and may lead to silence and discrimination.

White privilege

While we may not think of ourselves as privileged, we often do benefit from social inequities. In fact, a recent Pew Research Center survey found that 46 percent of white people say they benefit from these inequities. But those privileges are the result of conscious choices, not just the decisions of lawmakers and loan officers. Multiple surveys of white people have revealed a wide support for racial equality but little interest in policies to attain it.

While racism relies on racialization, which is the practice of grouping people based on perceived differences, this practice has historically generated biases and justified a variety of ill-treatment against non-whites. Jim Crow laws and slavery have both served to legitimize this treatment. Ultimately, the underlying racism created a climate in which white people were accustomed to ignoring the mistreatment of non-whites and stayed silent because of the safety of their own skin color.

In fact, it’s hard to imagine a society without white people. The ability to shop at convenience stores, avoid confrontation, and remain silent in the face of racial injustice are all manifestations of white privilege. And this privilege is so deeply entrenched that many people don’t even realize it exists. As a result, they often view white privilege as a trivial inconvenience, whereas it actually has profound consequences.

Critical race theory

Critical race theory and racial equity are based on the principles of social justice and race equity. This methodology encourages researchers to consider the perspectives of marginalized communities when designing research. The theory also encourages researchers to engage in critical self-reflection. The research findings can be useful for public health policies and practices. Further, critical race theory can be useful in identifying gaps in housing and employment. Ultimately, the theory can help us understand the roots of racism in our society and work to eliminate it.

Critical race theory is gaining ground as a political force for change. Black Lives Matter has become the political catalyst for such change. But the movement has its critics, including a white teacher in Illinois who is suing his school district over racial discrimination. While critical race theory is an important subject, it is still largely unknown to most Americans. In general, most people are more likely to hear about it if they are Democrats or Republicans.

The emergence of critical race theory emerged from a legal analysis in the late 1970s. Its earliest forms were developed by Derrick Bell, Kimberle Crenshaw, and Richard Delgado. Bell’s work analyzed the social and legal contexts in which racism persists. Its opponents claim that acknowledging racism is racist, and they frame equity movements as an attack on white people. However, critics of critical race theory have been saying this for over 40 years. Bell was often referred to as the “godfather” of critical race theory, and he brought this theory to the intellectual battlefield.


Diversity is the opposite of segregation, and it is a term that describes a group that is different, yet similar. Diversity means there is no one-size-fits-all model of what diversity looks like and how it should be represented. Diversity is not enough if it does not also include people who have been historically marginalized. The more diverse an organization is, the better it will perform and more likely it will deliver shareholder value.

In the book, award-winning journalist Pamela Newkirk sheds light on the diversity industry by showcasing some of the few success stories, as well as sharing lessons from other industries. Unfortunately, the majority of organizations haven’t made much progress in achieving their diversity goals. Diversity, Inc. is a necessary assessment of workplace equity. The new buzzword may be good to talk about, but it isn’t bringing about much change.

While this may sound like a good idea, many organizations and corporations fail to recognize the many perspectives that people of all races, ethnicities, and sex backgrounds bring to the workplace. However, organizations with true D&I policies seek to attract diverse candidates and foster an inclusive environment in their workforce. The key to fostering a diverse culture is leadership, and it should begin from the top.


While the word “diversity” is often used to describe a more equal workplace, it is also an excuse for a lack of diversity. While efforts at workplace diversity have been lauded by elite institutions and affluent citizens, they have done little to bring equality to the largest industries in America. Instead, these efforts have tended to be misguided, often resulting in little or no progress. In addition to waffled answers, these initiatives often result in companies spending hundreds of millions of dollars and hiring consultants to try to achieve an equitable workplace.

Educators should understand that equity is rooted in racial justice. Equity is about removing structural barriers that prevent historically-marginalized students and professionals from reaching their full potential. Equity requires the school to become more race-conscious and conduct a thorough audit of current practices. While there is some evidence of bias in education, it can be difficult to quantify. Fortunately, research has shown that educators can improve their performance and create more equal environments by changing their own biases.

Inclusion means that individuals can preserve their cultural identity while being a member of the host culture. Integration is a two-way process, resulting in better treatment for those who don’t belong to the host culture. The new buzzword in racial equality is “inclusion”. This new concept of diversity promotes equality by recognizing and valuing diverse backgrounds. By eliminating bias and promoting inclusion, we can ensure that the social outcomes of diversity will be positive.

White allyship

There is no one definition for what white allyship is, but there are several common qualities among white people that make them more effective allies. First, they acknowledge the fact that the term is not perfect, and that some people may not like it. In addition, they acknowledge that the term may not always be useful or be applied in every context. Therefore, they offer resources for making themselves more effective allies.

Another common characteristic among white supremacists is their ability to respond to questions with a “please enlightenment” tone. They tell people that they are opposed to stereotypical racism and that they don’t believe in it, but in reality, they weaponize racism for their own survival. Similarly, white supremacists will say that they do not accept stereotyping or discrimination, but will use these to justify their behavior and the way they interact with others.

Lastly, if we want genuine White allyship, we must go beyond our comfort zone. Rather than using words like “comrade” or “allies,” we should use “co-conspirator,” which refers to those who actively take up the cause of black people. Instead of assuming the burden of racism on black coworkers and friends, we should be ready to sacrifice our comfortable lives in order to be an ally to all people.

Was it worth reading? Let us know.