How to Decolonise History

building with sculpture and stained glass windows
Photo by Maria Orlova on

Teaching decolonisation is an important part of anti-racism movements. In this article, we’ll discuss ways to teach decolonisation while reclaiming black history. This article also discusses how to diversify your curriculum. The ideas and concepts of decolonisation are a key component of teaching a diverse curriculum. The ideas and concepts of decolonisation are essential in teaching the African diaspora’s history.

Teaching decolonization as an anti-racism movement

The recent student movements that have pushed for the removal of Cecil Rhodes’ statue have sparked a worldwide call for decolonization. The University of Cape Town, for example, has a statue of the racist and imperialist business magnate on its campus. These students’ efforts have inspired initiatives across the world to challenge this practice. To fight global inequality, a decolonizing mindset is essential.

The problem with anti-racist education is that it often ignores Indigenous peoples and fails to offer effective solutions to the problems it exacerbates. Culturally inclusive education, on the other hand, tends to infuse mainstream education with Indigenous elements, resulting in a generalized explanation of Indigenous cultures. Both approaches face resistance in the educational institutions where they are implemented, but a decolonized framework is possible by weaving both approaches together.

Indigenous communities are often neglected in anti-racism education and literature. Despite dealing with similar experiences as people of colour, Indigenous peoples are often not given the appropriate place in anti-racism movements. Similarly, Canadian anti-racism neglects to acknowledge the ongoing colonization of Indigenous peoples in North America. And it is also not uncommon for educators to present a case of racism in a largely white context.

Despite the challenges, the decolonization of syllabus movement is slowly making its way into higher education. Though it may be easier to implement in subjects such as sociology, psychology, and history, faculty members should strive to incorporate STEM into their teaching so as to better serve BIPOC students. Additionally, colleges should not limit themselves to Eurocentric narratives and should provide counter-histories that reflect contributions by BIPOC communities. White faculty must also commit to racial consciousness and engage in critical interrogation of whiteness.

The Indigenous Strategic Plan at UBC is a good resource for researchers interested in the subject. This guide offers basic reference assistance free of charge. However, remote access to most library eResources is only available to current UBC students and staff. In addition to this, most books may be borrowed for a maximum of 2 weeks and renewed if no other borrower requests them. The Indigenous Strategic Plan at UBC also offers information on how to use the library.

Moreover, teachers should make use of a framework for antiracist pedagogy. The framework is based on five key areas of action that guide the faculty to become antiracist. Self-awareness is the first step in becoming an antiracist educator. Active self-criticism and regular reflection on Eurocentric assumptions are also crucial. To become an anti-racist educator, educators must know how to address their own biases and consciously transform their attitudes to promote a more inclusive society.

Diversifying the curriculum

Creating a more inclusive and diverse curriculum is one way to combat history’s racism and white supremacy. Diversifying the curriculum means incorporating the perspectives and ideas of marginalised groups into the curriculum. It promotes critical thinking about the dominant narratives of history. While it may be difficult to create a new canon overnight, it is not impossible. Rather, it requires the inclusion of all students and staff.

The process of diversifying the curriculum is an ongoing project that requires ongoing reflection on the impact it is having on society and education. However, it can start by examining the current state of history and assessing the impact of the curriculum on teaching history. While the current decolonising history movement is important, it risks reproducing a simplistic account of human history that places Europe at the centre stage and erases non-western colonial projects, cultures, and civilisations. The reality is that these non-western cultures and civilisations are intimately linked to the history of the world and the constitution of our modern world.

The process of decolonisation is a long and challenging one. In order to change systemic inequities in history, universities must include the work of BME historians in their curricula. Diversifying the curriculum to decolonise history is essential for facilitating meaningful discussions on race, gender, and class. Further, it is not enough to just add diverse texts to the classroom. Diversifying the curriculum is also important for creating a safe environment for students.

To implement a curriculum incorporating a decolonised history approach, university leaders and staff must engage in co-construction with the diverse student body. This requires a holistic approach at all levels of the university. Diversifying the curriculum should include different perspectives on assessment and teaching methods. By incorporating a diverse student body into the curriculum, it can help to increase diversity and improve learning outcomes for students from different backgrounds.

Decolonising the curriculum may sound like a trendy idea, but the concept is not a fad. It has been discussed in a number of HEIs in London and is currently being scrutinised by the Office for Students. Ultimately, this may change the world. It will be beneficial to students and teachers alike, as well as society. It is also important to remember that decolonisation is not about eliminating the history of colonialism, but rather about exposing power structures that were a part of the process of colonisation.

While decolonisation is welcome as a political debate, it should not be imposed or enforced. The political endorsement by university leaders of such an issue is not a good sign of leadership and crosses a very fundamental line. The Minister’s comments have once again thrust the debate about the importance of decolonising the history curriculum. The minister’s comments have led many to object to decolonisation, however, and it is clear that the pressure from Universities UK crosses a fundamental line.

Reclaiming black history

Reclaiming black history when decolonising our history has wide-ranging effects. It gives students a new lens with which to view their societies and their identities. It’s essential to remember that decolonising projects must also change the material conditions that colonisers created, and that we must forge a new path on their terms. Lavinya Stennett, a final-year student on the BA African Studies and Development Programme at SOAS University of London, argues that this book is essential reading.

Decolonisation was a critical step in the fight against racism and enslavement. Many important figures in black history and politics contributed to this movement, including the abolitionist Anna Julia Cooper and the sociologist W.E.B. Dubois, who argued for full equality for African Americans. Both women were fiercely critical of “accommodationist” approaches to racism and fought for their freedom.

The term ‘decolonising’ has received bad publicity in recent years, but this is not entirely the case. In fact, the term itself is a paradox, and the use of it to describe the process has spawned various interpretations and myths. Some public figures have given the term a distorted understanding, which led people to think that the ‘people’s revolution’ took place peacefully in the former European colonies. Moreover, the new sources of data that re-emerged, such as files from European governments, contested the traditional narrative of colonialism. In 2011, the Foreign Office acknowledged that eighty-eight thousand files had been migrated from the countries of the former European colonies.

To fully understand decolonisation, one must acknowledge that it is our own work and that of others. In doing so, we must allow those who have been silenced to speak and make their voices heard. In doing so, those who have used the language of oppression to make their point must acknowledge that they’ve been victimized. We must also acknowledge that we have the choice of colonizing or decolonising our history and our world. We must work to heal and restore the lands, cultures, and histories that were fractured by colonialism.

Was it worth reading? Let us know.