Should athletes who dope have to forfeit their titles and medals?

a medal on top of boxing gloves
Photo by RODNAE Productions on Pexels.com

Some people argue that athletes who dope should keep their titles and medals. They do not want the public to know about their dirty tricks. They also want to avoid embarrassment. After all, athletes work very hard to maintain their reputation. Many kids want to compete in their sport and might be interested in doping. This would only lead to them doing it to be more like the athletes they see on TV. However, the use of drugs is not moral to society.

Athletes should have to give up their titles and medals if they are found guilty of doping. This would discourage them from using banned substances and would encourage them to be more careful. It is also an incentive for them to be better. It would make them want to be clean. Athletes should be forced to dope by the public to show that their actions will have consequences.

This measure would also serve as a good example for athletes to emulate. It would show them that it is not acceptable to cheat or use banned substances. It would also provide them with a moral example. The public would see athletes as role models and be inspired by them. But if it were imposed on all athletes, this could create a negative image and lead to the widespread use of illegal substances.

The Olympic Committee’s new rules require athletes who dope to give back their titles and medals. If they don’t, then they will lose the chance to compete for them. The best example of this is the British weightlifter Kirsty Coventry, who was a two-time Olympian in the -75 kg category. She was one kilo shy of the podium when she was discovered doping.

The Proposition plan has some advantages and disadvantages. For one, it may be too lenient. Athletes will be unable to test for banned substances. But, they will be able to use improved techniques if they have access to new substances. It also creates peer pressure and will force athletes to train harder and compete harder. In the long run, this can only be good for the sport.

The use of drugs in sport is not a new phenomenon. It is a common practice that is widely accepted in other sports. Athletes will be more likely to test for drugs when competing in a sport they are not qualified for. For example, they may have a higher chance of winning if they do not dope. While it is a violation of the rules, this policy is unambiguous and unfair.

The use of drugs is not ethical and it is a clear violation of the rules of sport. The only reason it should be sanctioned is to protect the athletes who do it. But the rules do not have to be broken for the dopers to lose their titles and medals. The use of drugs is not moral, but it is a violation of the laws of the sport.

Athletes should be punished for the use of drugs in sports. Athletes should be disqualified from any sport in which they participate without doing so. Those who are caught taking these drugs are disqualified from the competition. They should be banned from all competitions. The drug policy should also prohibit all doping-related activities. There should be a minimum standard for these substances.

While doping is a legitimate activity, it is unfair for other athletes. Athletes should be punished for their actions. Athletes who dope have an unfair advantage over non-dopers. It is not ethical for athletes to get a competitive edge over their competitors. It is unfair to those who do not dope. In addition, they are not healthy and are not a good role model for young people.

Was it worth reading? Let us know.