Difference Between Review and Critique

Critique Feedback Rating Mood Scale Customer Red

There is always a noticeable thin line between a reviewer and a critique. Most people would even say that there is no significant difference at all. Some, however, have the knowledge to judge whether a spoken or written comment about anything is a review or a comment. 

What is the difference between a review and a critic?

If looked at from the writer’s point of view, a critic is someone who has committed a significant number of his or her time to master a particular area of expertise. The critic could have had the genre as her or his major in college or contributed to it. On the other hand, a reviewer is a person who formed an interest in a specific topic and has the liberty to voice her or his thoughts.

Yes, a critic is a more credible source than a reviewer, however the story doesn’t end here.

In terms of credibility, there is also a significant difference that makes a critique distinct from a review. Reviews are prepared with the overall impression of the work in question. The comments are expressed not by looking at each unit but at how the whole system worked together.

“The musicians of the Broadway last week were very entertaining.”

In a critique, however, particular points are pointed out. It is deeper analyzed, looked at from every aspect, and justified on how the overall result had become. This is through the proper evaluation of each subject.

“The neat transition from one scene to the next avoided slips and therefore stopped the audience from boredom.”

Here are few additional differences between a critique and a review:

  1. A critique is a detailed assessment and analysis of something, especially a philosophical, literary, or political work or theory. A review presents overall analyses and evaluates work. Critique may contain an in-depth interpretation of the separate elements of the work or theory. A review may present you with simple information about a piece of work. A review carries an overall impression, general information, and opinion.
  2. Critiques can be more reliable than reviews since they have expertise in a particular subject, whereas a review is written in the form of a personal opinion.
  3. Critique may not be understood and read by everyone as they’re long, extremely detailed, and cover every work or play element. Review can be understood and read by anyone as they are kept simple and fun. It is more consumer-oriented.

Although a critique may appear to be a better choice for people to read before purchasing or viewing something, there is a reason why other people would love to go for a review. It is because reviewers are those people who are there not as experts but just to experience something like an average individual.

Was it worth reading? Let us know.